2.6
2023

Patch test sensitization and permanent tattoos: epidemiological data from two referral centers

Show more: Authors information and Publication history
Authors Information

1Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy
2Dermatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
3Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy

History

Published: 10 June 2026
Accepted: 25 May 2026
Received: 10 January 2026

SUMMARY

Background. Permanent tattoos introduce pigments and metal contaminants into the dermis, potentially triggering allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). However, comparative analyses between tattooed and non-tattooed individuals remain limited. This study aimed to assess the impact of tattoos on allergic sensitization and patch test (PT) reactivity. Methods. Retrospective observational analysis of 485 adults undergoing PT at two referral centers in Milan (December 2024-June 2025) was included in this study. Patients were classified as tattooed (n = 107) or non-tattooed (n = 378). Patch testing was performed according to the 2024 Italian Baseline Series; reactions were graded following International Contact Dermatitis Research Group guidelines. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with positive reactions, adjusting for MOAHLFA characteristics (male sex, occupational dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, hand/leg/face dermatitis, age > 40 years). Given the retrospective design, the analyses are subject to potential selection bias and unmeasured confounding. Results. Sensitization rates to standard allergens did not differ between the two groups analyzed. However, receiving the first tattoo > 5 years prior 2025 was associated with a 4.4-fold higher risk of nickel sensitization (p = 0.029, OR = 4.407, 95%CI 1.166-16.656). Conclusions. Tattoos do not appear to significantly influence sensitization to standard allergens; however, long-term tattoo exposure is associated with an increased rate of nickel sensitization. These findings may reflect differences in cumulative nickel exposure over time, potentially related to the timing of tattooing and regulatory changes. Consideration of tattoo history and temporal exposure is recommended when assessing ACD risk.

KEY WORDS
Allergic contact dermatitis; patch test; permanent tattoo; tattoo; epidemiology.

Table of Content: Online First

European Annals of Allergy and Clinical Immunology ISSN 1764-1489 | ©2026